Start with an audit when
- No recent review exists
- The surface is broad
- You need prioritization
- Procurement or launch pressure is unclear
Audit or sprint
WCAG audit vs remediation sprint
An audit identifies and prioritizes barriers. A remediation sprint fixes confirmed issues, adds acceptance criteria, and helps teams verify the release.
Comparison
Choose the right next step for the product state
| Factor | WCAG-focused audit | Remediation sprint |
|---|---|---|
| Best when | You do not know which issues matter most. | You already have findings or a focused scope to fix. |
| Output | Human-reviewed findings, severity, evidence, and priorities. | Developer-ready tickets, implementation support, QA notes, and evidence archive. |
| Team need | Risk clarity. | Execution capacity. |
| Follow-up | Prioritize remediation and monitoring. | Verify fixes and monitor regression-prone surfaces. |
Start with remediation when
- Findings already exist
- The issue set is confirmed
- Engineering needs tickets
- Release timing is tight
Related services
Move from comparison to a practical next step.
Guides
Read the supporting technical guides.
FAQ
Careful answers before you choose a path.
Is Silicon Lemma a law firm?
No. Silicon Lemma provides technical accessibility engineering, remediation, monitoring, and documentation support. Legal obligations should be reviewed with qualified counsel.
Do you guarantee compliance?
No. We do not make legal guarantees. We provide WCAG-focused technical review, human-reviewed findings, remediation support, and evidence notes.
Can you help after the comparison?
Yes. A comparison page can lead into a risk review, remediation sprint, Shield Monitoring, or procurement evidence support depending on the surface.
Loading risk review form...